Posted in Static News

Senate Democrats’ push for new witnesses voted down

   July 8, 2021  45 Comments on Senate Democrats’ push for new witnesses voted down

Only two Republicans voted to call witnesses in the impeachment trial: Sens. Susan Collins and Mitt Romney.

WATCH THE FULL EPISODES OF ‘WORLD NEWS TONIGHT’:
https://bit.ly/2S3WEgu

WATCH OTHER FULL EPISODES OF WORLD NEWS TONIGHT:
http://abc.go.com/shows/world-news-tonight

WATCH WORLD NEWS TONIGHT ON HULU:
https://hulu.tv/33iKepm

#WorldNewsTonight #DavidMuir #ImpeachmentTrial

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)
Website Twitter

45 thoughts on “Senate Democrats’ push for new witnesses voted down”

  4. Once and for all, birdbrains, The House did call 17 witnesses. In addition they either called and/or subpoenaed national security advisor Bolton, acting WH chief of staff Mick Mulvaney,,, both refused to appear. John Eisenberg, the lead attorney for the National Security Council, and Robert Blair, a top aide to Mulvaney. both skipped depositions scheduled by the House Intelligence, Oversight, and Foreign Affairs Committees.
    National Security Council aide Michael Ellis and Office of Management and Budget aide Brian McCormack were scheduled and refused to appear. They either defied subpoenas or went to court to avoid testifying. There were at least 100 Republican members of Congress and lawyers who either attended or could have but refused to attend the impeachment inquiry and had equal time to ask questions. These are the ones who made a public display of "storming" the inquiry because they were being "denied" access, when all they had to do was go in, but some ignorant people fell for their publicity stunt. They also were not "denied" relevant witnesses and Shumer sent a specific invitation to Trump to appear, which of course, he refused. They just didn't want any witnesses close to the president to testify because they were afraid of what they'd say, as the Senate proved later in the impeachment trial. So SHUT UP ALREADY, about Trump's whining that he was treated unfairly. He's the one being unfair to voters by deciding for them that he can cheat because he thinks his winning is in the best interest of the country. Well, there are a lot of other candidates who think their winning is in the best interest of the country. So the Senate can shove its excuse for its cowardice to "let the people decide." How can they honestly decide when their man Trump is rigging the elections?

  5. The hypocracy is stunning. Trump's quest for the truth about the last administration's possibly corrupt actions is somehow an impeachable offence. But demanding more witnesses with the admitted intention of negating the last election and impacting the next election is perfectly fine.

  6. Willard MITTENS Romney has dirty dealings in Ukraine as well & he's desperate
    no one finds his connections to corruption in the Ukraine.
    The GUILTY always are the first to yell & scream someone else is responsible for crimes they've
    committed. Willard MITTENS Romney is too insistent witnesses be called

  8. "NOT IMPEACHABLE"….49 to 51…the numbers alone tell the tragic truth:…no one in Washington is willing to do the right thing by the American people! THAT is the tragedy…not a "bad process" or a "failed Congress". The Congress has done an amazing amount of actual WORK during this so called "unfair attack on a President"! When is a Presisdent supposed to receive MORE fair process than the people who voted for him? Only during the "Trumpian Age" do we have a Congress that allows executive privilege to "trump" the people's right to hear, see, and know the facts and the truth about the actions that, without a doubt, were an abuse of a President's power.

  9. Ok here it goes… burden sharing & corruption is part of the foreign policy standers President Trump looks into before handing over tax payers money. Burisma was in a state of corruption. Therefore regardless of Hunter Biden working there Trump does have a right to bring up the issue of Burisma corruption. So even if President Trump did say to John Bolton no money to Ukraine until the Burima corruption is resolved. There is nothing wrong with President Trump wanting the Brisma corruption issue resolved before handing over our tax payer money. Oh by the way the Brisma Hunter Biden situation does indeed need to be looked into.

  11. DEMOCRATS with President obama care was declared and here comes PRESIDENT Trump attempting for quid pro qou tha is NOT DONE YET please be more logical im not an attorney but i know what is right

  12. The Republican Senators are helping Trump to destroy our Democracy period!!!! We have been compromised by the Republicans to treat Trump like a dictator and try cover up his messed that he will continue to do. Putin told Trump thank you for destroying your democracy now we can build more dictator nations and no need for a body of Congress they going to do what I tell them to do.

  13. The day The Senate Failed and Our Government betrayed us, this day will go down in history, but let it also say that there were -2 Brave American's who tried to say No and Voted yes for us S Collins and M Romney!

  14. The house should have called him to testify before sending impeachment to the senate. The case was messed up from the start.

  15. That is pritty lame, could've find/get 2 more Votes for witness's and documents. Show's how guilty Trump is along with how corrupt the Senate truly is. Our Government has failed us.

  16. Yeah after they shot down the Republicans' request for witnesses they want to make their own request and act like the Reps are holding back a fair investigation. Not fooling me stupid Dems. IF you want your own witnesses, allow the other side to have there's and then we will really know what's going on. Only if they did would they interview the whistleblower and find out the accusation was faked and the whole impeachment was a sham, but they won't do that will they..

    Edit ~ Hope to see an investigation on the whistle blower and Bidens ASAP. If we let the Democratic party do what it wants again they will push another Russia gate or something of the like. DRAIN THE SWAMP

  17. yea izzywizzy alot of anger and name calling all iam saying that it doesnt matter who blocks who he is a free person and if he thought something was wrong and that important he could have spoken up

  22. Love how my YouTube feed is inundated by this garbage. All ABC NBC CNN nothing from any credible sources, just the hacktivists. Fuck You YouTube this is why I use add blocking pihole Google doesn't get a dime from me.

  24. The answer, Chucky, is that you had the chance when Schiff and Nadler both could have called these witnesses. The 33 days that Nancy wasted in such a “time critical, urgent ” (bwah ha ha) need to impeach could have been used to let subpoena challenges to work through the courts. The fact that you couldn’t wait just shows that that the Democrats did a “schiffy” job. But more so the process y’all forgot that the process itself must favor the defendant; in as such we should not be requiring them to prove innocence. But you forgot your basic civics lesson but required Trump to do just that. Shame on you all.

  26. All I'm saying is if he had nothing to hide, he should've let witnesses come in. The truth would've come out. I'm not even talking about Bolton. Literally every person he blocked was likely to incriminate him. Lying is harder here than it actually is.

    And while I agree, the final remedy will be the election, it doesn't seem right when this all started when he tried to get info for the coming election.

  27. 🔴 WHAT A WASTE IF TIME 🙄… YES, TRUMP HAS A BAD CHARACTER, but after hating him because he is not supporting your LIBERAL, ABORTION, GAY, and GLOBALISATION POLICIES, you were hell bent from day one to get him impeach☝🏾

  31. Democrats just wanted to drag out the clown train they started. We are right where we all knew we'd be=-acquittal . We just got there before the socialist wanted to.

  32. Trump should of never been impeached by the House. Why, because he beat Hillary and corrupt media heads like David are corrupt as the demonic Democrats! Trump should have his 4 years back.

  36. “It’s a grand tragedy…” that your old ass doesn’t have a term limit

  38. It’s a tragedy that Americans don’t know that a Charter government is running the US as a corporation and not a republic! This happened back in 1933 when Roosevelt sold out America to the bankers. That’s why you have this shit show going on in DC.

  42. Democratic suck like CNN… fake news crap. Bunch of cry babies like Chuck suck Dickman. I can see the blood shoot eyes on cougar Nancy fake boobs Pelosi…lolol… stop wasting taxpayers money and start working hard like trump to make America great again… 😂😂😂…. get the point in your thick head. The people don’t give a rat ass what crimes president trump did. We just love him for who he is. And he is fighting for America. Unlike all these cry babies pointing finger at trump and doing Shit for America all years.

  43. Unfair processes unfair trial, the take away is, this country can defiantly run just fine with less government. 🤔

  44. why didnt they get those witnesses during impeachment? If they wanted to charge him with a crime, why didnt they get all the witnesses beforehand? How hard would that have been?

Comments are closed.