Civil rights attorney challenges defendants’ actions in Ahmaud Arbery murder trial

Civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong condemns the death of Ahmaud Arbery and offers solutions to dwindling race relations in the United States.

WATCH the ABC News Livestream: https://bit.ly/3rzBHum
SUBSCRIBE to ABC News: https://bit.ly/2vZb6yP
WATCH MORE on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/abc

#ABCNL #AHMAUDARBERY #MURDERTRIAL #RACERELATIONS

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

23 thoughts on “Civil rights attorney challenges defendants’ actions in Ahmaud Arbery murder trial

  1. They are not going to get off I am tired of people getting away with this I am tired but the trick the defense tried to do with the jury is not going to work in Jesus name it is not going to work please GOD DONT LET IT WORK THANK YOU FATHER GOD AMEN

  2. No matter how well the prosecution is there are questions that will be omitted from the case and the judge knows this, the defense knows hateful words will condemn them, shielding the jury is for white people only.

  3. We're headed in a time machine to a horrid historical past. Figuratively, the closer the machine travels to this time, the more literal actions occurred in the past.

  4. How would she know that there were black jurors who were "unnecessarily dismissed"?
    There's no way she would know such a thing.
    What difference does the racial make up of the jury have to do with anything? 🤔
    Jury members are given instruction based on the law. They all have to follow the same jury instruction regardless of their race.
    If you don't have confidence that a jury can come to a fair verdict unless different races are represented, then I guess you don't trust almost all other verdicts in other trials?

  5. The only person who was defending himself was black or Africanamerican (freed slave, 2nd class citizenry), so his rights dont matter and the racist who killed him cry self-defense. That defense should have standards and this kangaroo court would not be happening. They should've plead out instead this case proves systemic racism.

  6. I think that Law enforcements need to have a real proof before accusing somebody of wrong doing. They accuse an individual first before they realize that person is innocent of any wrong.

  7. If jurors who believe that the confederate flag is racist are excluded, that means that 90% of blacks in this country and over 50% of all Americans can’t serve on this jury!!! The fix is it!

  8. LET THINK IF THE JURORS WOULD BEEN MOSTLY BLACK AND ONE WHITE, HOW WOULD THAT TURN OUT IT WOULDN'T EVER, FLATOUT! MY THEORY IS PREMEDITATED MUDER, INTEND TO KILL, IF THE RACIST MISERABLE NEANDERTHALS, WOULD'VE CALLED THE COPS, WHAT WOULD THESE GUYS TELL THE COPS, WOULD AHMAUD, WOULD STILL BE ALIVE, TODAY, STRAIGHT UP NO CHASER!

  9. They all need to fry in the 💺for killing that innocent young man. Killed a man for jogging with a double barrel shot gun outside on the streets. Chased down and hunted like a 🦌

  10. As a Country, we don't have any further to go. America is in total DENIAL. The journey to JUSTICE is over! We are at a impasse, thank God. And now His judgment has come, and shall STAND forever on America. Don't bother with your false attempts at reconciliation, {lip service) its too late.

Comments are closed.