Judge Cannon SCREWS Entire JUDICIAL DISTRICT with Stunt

Judge Aileen Cannon has decided to turn her courtroom into a sideshow spectacle by allowing oral arguments by third parties over Donald Trump’s ridiculous motions. Florida State Prosecutor Dave Aronberg reacts to a recent motion filed by one of these third parties.

Visit https://meidastouch.com for more!

Support the MeidasTouch Network: https://patreon.com/meidastouch
Add the MeidasTouch Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-meidastouch-podcast/id1510240831
Buy MeidasTouch Merch: https://store.meidastouch.com

Follow MeidasTouch on Twitter: https://twitter.com/meidastouch
Follow MeidasTouch on Facebook: https://facebook.com/meidastouch
Follow MeidasTouch on Instagram: https://instagram.com/meidastouch
Follow MeidasTouch on TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@meidastouch

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

22 thoughts on “Judge Cannon SCREWS Entire JUDICIAL DISTRICT with Stunt

  1. Why doesn’t her boss step in….where is her boss. She is making a mockery of the justice system! It is clear she is corrupt a trump voter…..time for someone, anyone who is NOT a freak to step in and remove her! She has not only embarrassed herself. But the whole justice system!!! These are the incompetent justices TRUMP put on the benches during his term….should really open everyone’s eyes as to the types he selects…idiots, corrupt, incompetent!!! Americans deserve better !!! Get involved Boss time to shut this shit show down & get this trial going…it should hv been date set & everyone preparing for trial!!

  2. Why are they allowing Judge Cannon to do favors for trump. I don't understand how she gets away with this. The Supreme Court is definitely corrupt and it seems there's nothing anybody can do about it. The rules need to be changed for this Supreme Court because they are supposed to uphold the law and they are blatantly corrupt. I don't get it. It's really sad all this for the criminal Donald Trump. What the hell does he have over these judges. 😡

  3. Isn't Trump in the Supreme Court giving arguments concerning the President rights to assanate his opponent. Because of article 2 a President can do whatever he wants. Didn't he say all President's. Not if they come for him. Fork tongue 👅😛🤡👿💩

  4. She has no clue what she’s doing on such a large case like that, trying to help Trump escape judgement! Jack Smith needs to get her removed and get a Judge that knows what he/she is doing! Why isn’t Jack Smith stopping this circus!!

  5. Put her under surveillance and tap her phone!! Is she meeting with trump lawyers/handlers on the side? Is she talking with trumps cult? Can’t you get her out of there already? She has to be consulting with trump and she should be investigated immediately!! So where is homeland security and the FBI and the DOJ and the CIA???

  6. It seems like Jack Smith would have enough ammo to fire at Cannon, as she was already in hot water. 'Cannon heard Trump’s challenge to the government’s classified-documents investigation, appointed a special master to review the documents, and temporarily barred the Justice Department from using those records in its investigation. That much-maligned decision was later reversed by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit consisting of three conservative judges: two Trump appointees and the G.W. Bush–appointed Chief Judge William Pryor. They wrote that her decision violated “clear” law and that her approach “would be a radical reordering of our caselaw limiting the federal courts’ involvement in criminal investigations” and “violate bedrock separation-of-powers limitations.”

    Now that the same investigation has resulted in an indictment against Trump, Cannon’s prior, fundamentally erroneous approach casts a shadow over the proceedings. Because her earlier handling of this case went well outside the judicial norm and was roundly criticized by the Court of Appeals, reasonable observers of this case could question her impartiality. Federal law has a way to deal with this challenge: Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), a judge “shall disqualify himself [or herself] in any proceeding in which his [or her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Cannon’s situation clearly fits that test, and she is obligated to recuse herself in Trump's case.'

Leave a Reply